Beijing: Foreign Experts wanted to avert more PR(C) Disasters

Life’s hasn’t been nice to China Radio International (CRI). The propaganda juggernaut hasn’t been mentioned in the nation’s chairman’s new year addresses in recent years (as had been a time-honored custom during previous decades), it had been described as a bottomless pit of waste by Keith Perron (a former CRI presenter himself), and the international broadcaster’s borrowed-boats strategy probably caused some chuckles in the industry, too. Other “international” media outlets from the Middle Kingdom aren’t really effective either. Whenever they catch attention, it’s for anchors losing it, or similar not so-work-related reasons – at least in Western countries.

CRI’s German service is a brilliant example of how propaganda on a foreign audience simply can’t work. On the past two Sundays, they broadcast the same edition of their “listeners forum”, with just one listener quoted there (maybe he was the only one who wrote in), and later on, a “report” on electrical power supply in Tibet (also the second time on two consecutive Sundays). That doesn’t mean that there aren’t any listeners – some actually appear to be listening religiously, and Beijing’s propaganda is in no position to abandon these early Christians. But it appears to be a small flock. And given the truthful (and therefore highly unpleasant) representation of Beijing’s attitude towards Tibet, for example, it can’t be a big audience.

If you, as a government or collective dictatorship, can’t bring yourself to destroy some quarters of the state-owned industrial sector (as prescribed by the neo-liberal foreign press), you certainly cannot break an unsinkable aircraft carrier with thousands of jobs up, either. But you can still do two things. Measure number one is to keep the ineffective bathing tub*) in your coastal waters, while venturing into international waters with some international expertise. That, at least, appears to be on Xi Jinping‘s mind – Xi is the guy who hasn’t mentioned CRI in his new-year addresses.

And while the foreign expertise is going to work for you, you can kick all those foreign correspondents out who treat China unfairly. That would be measure number two. In fact, measure number two has been practiced for ages.

(On a private note, I’m not sure if putting lipstick on the pig will really make the pig look nicer, or more convincing. But then, the pig has little to lose – and I’m going to watch the experiment with some curiosity.)

____________

Note

*) Given the wide range of languages and target areas, there may be CRI brances which are a success story, in terms of feedback from the audience, etc.. But I haven’t heard of them yet.

____________

4 Comments to “Beijing: Foreign Experts wanted to avert more PR(C) Disasters”

  1. There is one section of CRI which has been a success: the Esperanto service. It remains the only radio station to broadcast entirely in Esperanto in the whole world, as far as I know. For this reason, it is well known within the international community of Esperanto speakers.

    I think everyone understands that it’s just propaganda, but still it’s propaganda in Esperanto, so it gets some credit. Here’s its website: http://esperanto.cri.cn/

    Like

  2. And this is Radio Havano Kubo’s website in Esperanto: http://www.radiohc.cu/eo
    Also available on shortwave.

    In the past, Polish foreign radio spoke Esperanto, too, but that was long ago.

    贵在坚持。

    Like

  3. I didn’t know about Cuban radio. The Polish foreign radio broadcasts in Esperanto were ceased a few years ago by the right-wing government of the Kazcynski brothers (or how on earth it’s spelled). When a delegation from the Esperanto movement went to complain to a government representative, they were met with antisemitic comments related to Zamenhof, the creator of Esperanto, being a Polish Jew. Some of the comments were along the lines of “why don’t the Esperantists ask Israel to fund their radio station?” and “you say Zamenhof was a great Pole, but then why is he buried in a Jewish cemetery”?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: