Posts tagged ‘China’

Saturday, March 28, 2020

Obituary: Sin Un-ho, 1941 – 2020

Sin Un-ho (Korean: 김정은, Chinese: 申云浩), a North Korean lyricist, died on Monday, according to a Korean Workers’ Party central committee communiqué, published by Uriminzokkiri, a website apparently based in Shenyang, Liaoning province. According to the communiqué (and Google Translate), he “tragically died” from heart failure.

Not known for funny stuff: Sin Un-ho

Sin was born in Pongchon County, now North Korea, on January 17, 1941, also according to the a/m online sources. He is described as a prolific librettist of “Juche music”, and probably best known for the text to the “Song of General Kim Jong-il”.

The country’s official news agency KCNA, in a newslet on Wednesday, referred to him as

a talented soldier writer loved by the people under the care of the Party. He held firm the writing pen of the revolution for years and created lots of noted lyric lines and poems of high ideological and artistic value. They included immortal revolutionary hymn “Song of General Kim Jong Il” reflecting the demand of the times and the desire of the people, which made great contributions to the development of Juche-oriented literature and art. [No permalink.]

____________

Related

Thoroughly into Factories & Countryside, Sept 28, 2012
金正日将军之歌(Chinese subtitles), 1997
Supreme commander (Moranbong Band)
雪白的霜花 (Korean subtitles), attributed to Sin
____________

Friday, March 27, 2020

US support for Taiwan’s diplomatic alliances “uncompromisingly opposed” by FMPRC

The following is a translation of a newslet from China News Service (CNS, 中国新闻),the country’s second-largest newsagency after Xinhua.

“An Act to express United States support
for Taiwan’s diplomatic alliances
around the world”

Main link: China’s foreign ministry reacts to America’s signing of legislation concerning Taiwan, strongly urges America to correct mistake (中国外交部回应美方签署涉台法案:强烈敦促美方纠正错误)

CNS, Beijing, March 27 — (Huang Yuqin reporting)  Countering America signing the negative bill concerning Taiwan, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said on a regular press conference on Friday that China strongly urged America to correct its mistake and not to implement that legislation, and not to obstruct any country’s development of ties with China. Otherwise, it would inevitably be met with a resolute Chinese counterattack.

中新社北京3月27日电 (黄钰钦)针对美方签署涉台消极法案,中国外交部发言人耿爽27日在例行记者会上表示,中方强烈敦促美方纠正错误,不得实施该法,不得阻挠各国同中国发展关系。否则,必将遭到中方坚决反击。

A reporter asked, the American president signed the “Taiwan Friendship International Protection and Strengthening Initiative” bill [into legislation]. How does China comment on this?

有记者提问,美国总统签署了“台湾友邦国际保护及加强倡议法案”。中方对此有何评论?

Geng Shuang replied that America’s so-called “Taipei bill” seriously violated the one-China principle and the rules of the Sino-American Three Communiqués, goes against international law and the fundamental standards of international relations, and interfered in domestic Chinese politics. China expressed intense resentment and uncompromising opposition against this.

耿爽回应称,美方所谓“2019年台北法案”严重违反一个中国原则和中美三个联合公报规定,违背国际法和国际关系基本准则,干涉中国内政。中方对此表示强烈不满和坚决反对。

He pointed out that worldwide, 180 countries had established diplomatic relations with China, with America having established diplomatic relations with China on the basis of the one-China policy as early as 41 years ago. The above-mentioned bill demands the obstruction of other countries sovereign countries’ developing normal national relations. This is undisguised hegemonial logic.

他指出,世界上已有180个国家同中国建交,美国自己早在41年前就在一个中国原则基础上同中国建交,上述法案却要求阻挠其他主权国家同中国发展正常国家关系,这是赤裸裸的霸权主义逻辑。

Geng Shuang emphasized that the Taiwan issue concerns China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and China’s core interests. China’s government and people determination and volition to defend their core interests is rock-solid. We strongly urge America to correct its mistake and not to implement that legislation, and not to obstruct any country’s development of ties with China. Otherwise, it would inevitably be met with a resolute Chinese counterattack. (end)

耿爽强调,台湾问题事关中国主权和领土完整,事关中国核心利益。中国政府和人民捍卫核心利益的决心和意志坚如磐石。我们强烈敦促美方纠正错误,不得实施该法,不得阻挠各国同中国发展关系。否则,必将遭到中方坚决反击。(完)

____________

Related

Led by Nancy Pelosi, J. Smith, Mar 27, 2020
Senate and House bill, Jan 3, 2020
China’s rising aggression, Jan 28, 2017

____________

Friday, March 27, 2020

Li Keqiang: Unlike SARS, COVID-19 is unlikely to disappear all of a sudden

The following is a translation of an article published by the Chinese State Council on March 24

Original title / main link
Li Keqian: All regions must report the epidemic situation realistically and transparently, and must not conceal or leave out anything ( 李克强:各地要实事求是公开透明发布疫情信息,不得瞒报漏报 )

“All regions must report the epidemic situation realistically*) and transparently, and must not conceal or leave out anything.” Member of the politburo’s standing committee, chief state councillor, and central small leading group to counter the new coronavirus infection pneumonia epidemic group leader Li Keqiang emphasized that “seeking truth from the facts refers to do the prevention and control work in a focused way, and once an epidemic situation is discovered, accurate control must be carried out immediately, make sure that the range of territory which needs to be controlled for cases and possible infections is big enough to be effective. Openness and transparency means that once a case is discovered, it is reported, and whatever it is, it is. Nothing must be concealed or left out.”

“各地要实事求是、公开透明发布疫情信息。” 中共中央政治局常委、国务院总理、中央应对新冠肺炎疫情工作领导小组组长李克强3月23日在领导小组会议上强调,“实事求是是指有针对性地做好防控,一旦发现疫情,第一时间进行精准管控,把病例和可能传播的场所控制在有效范围;公开透明就是指发现一例报告一例,是什么就是什么,不得瞒报漏报。”

Li Keqiang pointed out that while the national epidemic situation with Wuhan as the main battleground had basically been blocked by now, the risk of sporadic transmission cases and local epidemic outbreaks continues to exist, and in addition, there was a major epidemic globally. The situation therefore remained complicated and serious. By data patterns established by epidemiologists at home and abroad, by trends scientifically researched and judged, it is widely believed that this time’s epidemic is unlikely to disappear all of a sudden, like SARS did at that time. We must therefore be mentally prepared for still more difficult and lasting prevention and control.

李克强指出,当前,以武汉市为主战场的全国本土疫情传播已基本阻断,但零星散发病例和局部暴发疫情的风险仍然存在,加之疫情在全球出现大流行,形势依然复杂严峻。国内外流行病学专家通过建立各类数据模型,对疫情走势进行科学研判,普遍认为,此次疫情不大可能像当年SARS那样突然消失。因此,我们必须做好更加艰巨、更加持久的疫情防控思想准备。

“We can see from the current epidemic situation that that national and foreign experts’ analysis is scientifically founded,” the chief state councillor  said. He said that “this has made the prevention and control work more serious and challenging for us. Although the domestic epidemic situation has been basically blocked by now, that doesn’t mean that there won’t be further sporadic cases of infections spreading. We must resolutely contain the local outbreaks of epidemic situations by practically carrying out the measures of ‘early detection’, ‘early reporting’, ‘early quarantine’, and ‘early treatment’, and keep it from breaking out on an even larger scale.”

“从当前疫情形势看,国内外专家们的分析是有科学依据的。”总理说,“这为我们防控工作提出了更加严峻的挑战。虽然目前国内本土疫情传播已基本阻断,但这并不意味着零星散发病例就不再出现。必须把‘早发现、早报告、早隔离、早治疗’的防控措施落实到位,坚决遏制疫情在局部、甚至更大范围再次爆发。”

Li Keqiang pointed out that currently, most regions continued to report zero new daily confirmed cases, and this was, of course, was what the masses expected. However, one had to bear in mind that statistical data had to be true and accurate and there had to be no strives to report zero cases by concealment and omission.

李克强指出,目前全国大部分地区连续数日新增确诊病例零报告,这当然是人民群众期盼的。但要切记,疫情统计数据一定要及时真实准确,千万不能为追求零报告而瞒报漏报。

Li Keqiang emphasized that prevention and control of infections must always maintain the principles of seeking truth in the facts, openness, and transparency. That way, the masses could develop a more vigilant and active consciousness for being on their guard, and in turn, this wold be beneficial to preventive and control measures to be in place, thus keeping the epidemic situation from emerging once again.

李克强强调,传染病防控必须始终坚持实事求是、公开透明的原则,这样人民群众就会增加警惕性和主动防范的自觉性,反过来这也有利于防控措施落实到位,进而防止疫情出现反弹。

____________

Note

*) literally: all places must report the epidemic situation by seeking the truth in the facts, and transparently, …

____________

Monday, March 16, 2020

New Diplomatic Normal: “Give your esteemed Country’s Voters an Explanation”

Latest diplomatic hero: Zhang Xiao,
ambassador to Kazakhstan

The following is a translation published by Guanchazhe online (观察者网, Shanghai) on Monday, covering a Facebook post written by China’s ambassador to Kazakhstan, Zhang Xiao (张霄).

Diplomats, and especially Chinese diplomats, are usually the last officials who like to become noisy, but the times are changing, and so are the demands on them. The recent behavior of Chinese ambassadors, most notoriously the one to Sweden, Gui Congyou, should probably not be seen as populism, at least not in a classical sense.

Such explosions aren’t temper tantrums. They are attempts to intimidate other stakeholders, preferably smaller countries. Charm offensives aren’t completely out, but mostly restricted to “friendly” countries like Cambodia, Myanmar, or Pakistan.

Therefore, we should probably think of this as beauty contests on Xi Jinping’s catwalk – the new diplomatic normal, prescribed by the center. (A recall of Chinese ambassadors will just lead to another guy doing his best, so waste no time on it.)

Zhang Xiao’s facebook post, and Zhao Lijian‘s Tweet (referred to in the following Guanchazhe article) are somewhat different from Gui Congyou’s in that they apparently aren’t trying to pressurize a smaller country, but rather to excel in a global opinion struggle, and to impress their superiors.

Main link: Ambassador to Kazakhstan shows his dislike for America: a waste of the time won by China (我国驻哈萨克斯坦大使怼美国:浪费中国赢得的时间)

As some of America’s high-ranking officials and members of the House of Representatives have repeatedly talked about a “China virus” as a way to use it as a stigma, another Chinese diplomat strikes back on social media abroad.

【文/观察者网 齐倩】在美国部分高官、议员多次将新冠肺炎污名化为“中国病毒”后,又一中国外交官在国外社交媒体上发出回击。

On March 14, our country’s ambassador to Kazachstan, Zhang Xiao, denounced America of only caring about vilifying and slandering China, wasting precious time that China had earned the world.

3月14日,我国驻哈萨克斯坦大使张霄也在脸书用俄语发声,指责美国在疫情初期只顾诋毁诽谤中国,白白浪费了中方用生命为世界赢来的宝贵时间。

He also pointed straight away at America’s epidemic data as being “too watered-down”, yelling that America’s government should be public and transparent, not politicize the virus, or swing pans around and seek scapegoats!

他还直指美国的疫情数据“掺了太多水”,喊话美国政府要公开透明,不要将病毒政治化,也不要再甩锅找替罪羊了!

US Center for Disease Control and Prevention director previously conceded that Americans who died from influenza had in fact suffered from COVID-19 pneumonia, and after this matter had been exposed, foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian had written five tweets in a row on Twitter in the evening of March 12, both in Chinese and English, fuming at America that you owe us an explanation!

美国疾控中心主任此前承认美国有流感死者可能实患新冠肺炎,此事被曝光之后,外交部发言人赵立坚12日晚在推特上,用中英双语连发5条推文怒怼美国:欠我们一个解释!

In his tweet, Zhang Xiao shouted at America’s government: In the early stages of COVID-19 pneumonia epidemic, what did you do? Still infatuated with geopolitical games, domestic political agendas and slanders against China. You have wasted precious time that China had earned the countries of the world, including your country.

张霄在贴文中喊话美国政府:新冠肺炎疫情初期你们在干什么?仍醉心于地缘政治游戏、国内政治议程和诽谤中国。你们浪费了中国用生命为世界所有国家,包括你们在内,赢得的宝贵时间。

Zhang Xiao also attacked American data for not being transparent. He said that the American government had been confident that health officials’ warnings were lies, claiming that the situation was under control. By now, the COVID-19 virus had already spread into more than 40 US states, and you are losing your head out of fear right away.

张霄还抨击美国数据不公开透明。他表示,美国政府笃定本国卫生官员的预警是“谎言”,坚称局势已在控制中。而现在,新冠病毒已在美国40多个州蔓延,“你们马上变得惊慌失措”。

According to CNN’s latest reports, combined data from the respective US state governments and the CDC say that in 49 states, Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Islands and Washington D.C. had at least 3,482 confirmed cases of COVID-19, of who at least 65 people had died. West Virginia remained the only state without confirmed cases.

据美国有线新闻网(CNN)最新报道,综合各州政府机构和疾控中心(CDC)数据,在49个州、波多黎各、美属维尔京群岛和华盛顿特区至少有3482例新冠肺炎确诊病例,至少65人死亡。西弗吉尼亚州仍然是唯一一个没有确诊病例的州。

It is worth noting that CDC data have stopped as of March 13: 1,629 confirmed cases, 41 deaths. (Guanchazhe online note: US CDC stopped updating updating data on the weekend.

值得注意的是,美国疾控中心(CDC)的数据仍停留在3月13日:确诊病例1629例,死亡41例。(观察者网注:美国疾控中心周末停止更新数据。)

Zhang Xiao said that all the same, American scientists had confirmed themselves that many many people who had died of influenza were really victims of the COVID-19 virus, making the actual number of deaths from COVID-19 much higher,

张霄称,然而美国的科学家自己也证实,许多死于流感的人实际上是新冠病毒的受害者,所以实际死亡人数要多得多。“你们的数据里水分太多,谈何透明?”

[Apparently a caption of the Facebook entry:] The ridiculous thing is that facing an epidemic disease, your esteemed country has not taken emergency measures to mend the leaks, but shifted the responsibility to China, calling it “China virus”. Such a careless conclusion will inevitably raise suspicions among the popular feelings.

“可笑荒谬的是,面对流行病,贵国没有采取紧急措施来弥补和修补漏洞,而是把责任推给了中国,称其为“中国病毒”。如此草率地下结论,不免让人心生怀疑。” [End of caption]

He also continued to call on experts from all countries of the world to carry out research about the origin of the virus, and the truth would eventually come to light [literally: become clear under heaven]. What we must do now is that all countries unite, jointly resist the virus, but not shirk responsibility! There must be no pan-swinging and scapegoating again!

他还继续呼吁,各国专家都在对病毒起源进行研究,真相终将大白于天下。现在我们需要做的事情,就是各国团结一致,共同对抗病毒,而不是推卸责任。不要再甩锅找替罪羊了!

With the American epidemic becoming more serious day by day, Zhang Xiao [rhetorically] asked if your esteemed country’s lack of face masks, gloves, test reagents, equipment, and goods supplies and even the stock market crash were also China’s fault? It is time now to give your esteemed country’s voters and the international community an explanation, “what are you actually hiding?”

对于美国日趋严峻的疫情,张霄称,贵国缺乏口罩、手套、测试试剂和设备物资,甚至股市崩盘,这也是中国的错吗?现在是时候给贵国选民和国际社会一个交待了,“你们到底隐瞒了什么?”

Closing, Zhang Xiao explained that America’s government, as a result of its negligence in epidemic prevention, wasted the time China had gained for the world, and urged the US not to continue this kind of meaningless trick, because politicizing the virus would make the situation worse.

最后张霄重申,美国政府在防疫上的粗心大意,导致白白浪费了中国为世界赢得的时间,并敦促美国不要继续这种无意义的把戏,因为将病毒政治化会使情况变得更糟。

The virus is awful, even the strongest countries of the world won’t be able to withstand its blow. We must always remember not to expectorate into the well (not to do stupid things).

“病毒是可怕的,即使是世界上最强大的国家也会不堪一击。我们要永远记住,不要往井里吐痰(不要做蠢事)。”

Earlier,  high-ranking American officials and Members of the House of Representatives had, in disregard of WHO appeals, deliberately talked about a “China virus” as a way to use it as a stigma. According to a report on the Chinese embassy to Kazakhstan’s website, Zhang Xiao had forcefully stated his dislike of American politicans’ ridiculous statements as early as on March 9, saying that the COVID-19 virus had torn off America’s cold-blooded, hypocritical and arrogant mask.*)

此前,美国部分高官、议员多次无视世卫组织呼吁,故意将新冠肺炎污名化为“中国病毒”。据中国驻哈萨克斯坦大使馆网站报道,早在3月9日,张霄就在脸书力怼美国政客的荒谬发言,称新冠病毒撕下了美国冷血、虚伪和傲慢的面具。

Moreover, countering the so-called “virus’ orgin” controversy, foreign ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said in a reply on a regular press conference on March 13 that “we notice that recently, there have been discussions about the source of the virus. Individual high US government officials and Members of Congress are using this as a pretext for all kinds of false and irresponsible remarks to discredit and to attack China, to which we are resolutely opposed. In fact, the international community including America, have different views of the virus’ origin. China has always taken the view that this is a scientific issue and that we need to listen to scientific and professional opinions.”

另外,针对所谓“病毒起源”的争论,外交部发言人耿爽在3月13日召开的外交部例行记者会上回应称,“我们注意到,最近一段时间有一些关于新冠病毒源头的讨论。个别美国政府高官和国会议员借此发表种种不实和不负责任的言论,抹黑攻击中国,我们对此坚决反对。事实上,国际社会包括美国国内,对病毒源头问题有不同看法。中方始终认为,这是一个科学问题,需要听取科学和专业的意见。”

____________

Note

*) This doesn’t seem to make sense, but it’s how I’m reading it.

____________

Monday, March 9, 2020

A Violator of the Central Committee’s Eight-Point Frugality Code

The following is a translation of a “People’s Daily” notice, published on Friday, concerning the results of an investigation of Dai Zigeng, a journalist and party cadre. The South China Morning Post had reported on the opening of the investigation last year.

Just look at the decadent width of that easy chair.
(Photo source: Tweet by “People’s Daily”)

It is hard to tell how factual – and if factual, how unusual – the offenses Dai is accused of actually are. Certainly, his cultural role (not least in founding Beijing News / 新京报) seems to suggest that he was a comparatively liberal offical.

Main link:
Dai Zigeng, Beijing Cultural Investment Development Group Co. Ltd.’s former general manager, removed from party and public office (北京文投集团原总经理戴自更被开除党籍和公职)

People’s Daily online, Beijing, March 6 — According to the Beijing CPC Commission for Discipline Inspection, and following Beijing Municipal Committee’s approval, Beijing Commission for Discipline Inspection has started an investigation against former Beijing Cultural Investment Development Group Ltd‘s former deputy party secretary, deputy board of director, and general manager Dai Zigeng, for issues of seriously violating discipline.

人民网北京3月6日电 据北京市纪委监委消息,日前,经北京市委批准,北京市纪委监委对北京市文化投资发展集团有限责任公司原党委副书记、副董事长、总经理戴自更严重违纪违法问题进行了立案审查调查。

Upon investigation, Dai Zigeng violated political discipline and practices, resisted organizational examination, violated the Central Committee’s eight-point frugality code‘s spirit, obtained, held and actually used golf club membership cards, organized and participated in banquets paid for with public funds, highly consumptive pasttime activities, held meetings exceeding the standards, didn’t report personal matters in accordance with the facts, left and entered the country without permission, owned shares of non-listed companies, obtained huge profits, violated national and collective interests by allocating and buying dwellings, violated rules against holding concurrent posts, accepting options, not fulfilling his duties in party propaganda work properly, creating a bad influence, sought after vulgar delights, had improper sexual relationships with others, forged identity documents, made use of authority to obtain benefits in other peoples’ interests, accepting other peoples’ belongings of immense value.

经查,戴自更违反政治纪律和政治规矩,对抗组织审查;违反中央八项规定精神,违规取得、持有、实际使用高尔夫俱乐部会员卡,违规组织、参加用公款支付的宴请、高消费娱乐活动,超标准举办会议;不如实报告个人有关事项,未经批准出入国(边)境;拥有非上市公司股份,获取巨额收益,在分配、购买住房中侵犯国家、集体利益,违规兼职取酬,收受他人给予的期权;在党的宣传工作中,不正确履行职责,造成不良影响;追求低级趣味,造成不良影响,与他人发生不正当性关系;伪造身份证件;利用职权便利为他人谋取利益,收受他人财物,数额特别巨大。

As a leading party cadre, Dai Zigeng seriously violated political discipline, the spirit of the Central Committee’s eight-point frugality code, organizational discipline, honesty discipline, work discipline, life discipline, constituting offenses on duty and suspected bribery. Moreover, he wouldn’t moderate himself after the CPC’s 18th national conference, and irreverently and unrestrainedly ignore his irregular and vile behavior, its serious circumstances, the damage to the party’s course and image, all of which must be seriously handled.  In accordance with the “Regulation of the Communist Party of China on Disciplinary Actions”, the “Supervision Law of the People’s Republic of China”, and other relevant rules. After the Municipal Committee’s study meeting and approval, it was decided to punish Dai Zigeng by expulsion from the party, that the Beijing Commission for Discipline Inspection should sanction him by removal from public office, by seizing his illegal incomes, that his suspected  crime issues shall be transferred to the inspection organs for for investigation and prosecution in accordance with the law, and belongings be transferred in the course of the case.

戴自更身为党员领导干部,严重违反党的政治纪律、中央八项规定精神、组织纪律、廉洁纪律、工作纪律、生活纪律,构成职务违法并涉嫌受贿犯罪,且在党的十八大后不收敛、不收手,在党的十九大后不知敬畏、不知止,其违纪违法行为性质恶劣、情节严重,给党的事业和形象造成严重损害,应予严肃处理。依据《中国共产党纪律处分条例》、《中华人民共和国监察法》等相关规定,经市纪委常委会会议研究并报市委批准,决定给予戴自更开除党籍处分;由市监委给予其开除公职处分;收缴其违纪违法所得;将其涉嫌犯罪问题移送检察机关依法审查起诉,所涉财物随案移送。

Dai Zigeng’s CV

戴自更简历

Dai Zigeng, male, Han nationality, born in September 1963 in Zhejiang Province, Ninghai, CPC party membership in June, 1986, joined part work in August 1988.

戴自更,男,汉族,1963年9月出生,浙江宁海人,1986年6月加入中国共产党,1988年8月参加工作。

1988.08 – 2002.12 Successively holding posts as Guangming Daily chief editor’s office editor, Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region correspondent, journalism department editor, Guangdong correspoondent, deputy office director and director

1988.08-2002.12 历任光明日报社总编室编辑,新疆维吾尔自治区记者站记者,记者部编辑,广东记者站记者、副站长、站长

2002.12 – 2003.11 directly subordinated to Guangming Daily Group work departmental director (deputy office rank)

2002.12-2003.11 光明日报社直属报刊社工作部主任(副局级)

2003.11 – 2006.01 Guangming Daily Group work departmental director and Beijing News Group director

2003.11-2006.01 光明日报社直属报刊社工作部主任、新京报社社长

2006.01 – 2006.07 Guangming Daily Group work department director, Beijing News Group director and chief editor

2006.01-2006.07 光明日报社直属报刊社工作部主任、新京报社社长、总编辑

2006.07 – 2012.05 Beijing News Group director and chief editor

2006.07-2012.05 新京报社社长、总编辑

2012.05 – 2017.08 Beijing News Group director (administrative bureau level)

2012.05-2017.08 新京报社社长(正局级)

2017.08 – … Beijing Cultural Investment Development Group Co. Ltd. deputy party secretary, deputy chairman of board of directors, general manager, member of 13th Municipal Consultative Conference

2017.08- 北京文化投资发展集团有限责任公司党委副书记、副董事长、总经理;十三届市政协委员

Saturday, March 7, 2020

Taiwan’s Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法): an Attempt to Translate

A word of warning: this is a try to get an understanding of Taiwan’s anti-infiltration law – it seems that there is no English translation of it online yet. However, I am no lawyer, my language skills are far from perfect, and this attempt to translate the Chinese-language original is nothing the reader should rely on.

The same is true for links within blockquotes – they may or may not be accurate either.

Your input will be most welcome. Here goes —

Published on 109-01-151)

公(發)布日期:109-01-15

Content:

Presidential Decree Hua-Tzung 1-Yi No. 10900004161
中華民國一百零九年一月十五日總統華總一義字第 10900004161 號令

Enacted and promulgated full text of twelve articles, to be in effect from day of promulgation.
制定公布全文 12 條;並自公布日施行

Article 1
第 1 條
To guard against infiltration and meddling by enemy forces from outside our borders, to ensure national security and social stability, to protect the Republic of China’s sovereignty and its free democratic constitutional order, this law is specifically formulated.
為防範境外敵對勢力之滲透干預,確保國家安全及社會安定,維護中華民國主權及自由民主憲政秩序,特制定本法。

Article 2
第 2 條
Definition of this law’s wording:
本法用詞定義如下:
1, Enemy forces from outside our borders: refers to countries, political entities or groups at war or in military confrontation with our country.
一、境外敵對勢力:指與我國交戰或武力對峙之國家、政治實體或團體。
This also applies to countries, political entities or groups which advocate the use of non-peaceful means to harm our country’s sovereignty.
主張採取非和平手段危害我國主權之國家、政治實體或團體,亦同。
2, Sources of infiltration:
二、滲透來源:
(1) Enemy forces governments outside our borders and their affiliated organizations, institutions or dispatched persons.
(一)境外敵對勢力之政府及所屬組織、機構或其派遣之人。
(2) Enemy forces political parties or other organizations, groups or dispatched persons making demands for political goals.
(二)境外敵對勢力之政黨或其他訴求政治目的之組織、團體或其派遣之人。
(3) All organizations, institutions and groups which are established or essentially controlled by the organizations, institutions and groups [mentioned] in the two previous items.
(三)前二目各組織、機構、團體所設立或實質控制之各類組織、機構、團體或其派遣之人。

Article 3
第 3 條
No one must receive instructions, be entrusted or receive financial support, be donated to, or have funds provided for referendum-related activities2), from or by infiltration sources.
任何人不得受滲透來源之指示、委託或資助,捐贈政治獻金,或捐贈經費供從事公民投票案之相關活動。
Offenders against these rules will be sentenced to prison terms up to five years and up to 10 million NT$.
違反前項規定者,處五年以下有期徒刑,得併科新臺幣一千萬元以下罰金。

Article 4
第 4 條
No one must receive instructions, be entrusted or receive financial support from or by infiltration sources, for activities covered by article 43 of the Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Act, or article 45 of the Civil Servants Election And Recall Act.
任何人不得受滲透來源之指示、委託或資助,為總統副總統選舉罷免法第四十三條或公職人員選舉罷免法第四十五條各款行為。
Offenders against the aforementioned rules will be sentenced to prison terms up to five years and up to 10 million NT$.
違反前項規定者,處五年以下有期徒刑,得併科新臺幣一千萬元以下罰金。

Article 5
第 5 條
No one must receive instructions, be entrusted or receive financial support from or by infiltration forces to carry out activities as under article two of the Lobbying Act.
任何人不得受滲透來源之指示、委託或資助,進行遊說法第二條所定之遊說行為。
Offenders against the aforementioned rules will be sentenced to fines of more than 500,000, and up to five million NT$.
違反前項規定者,處新臺幣五十萬元以上五百萬元以下罰鍰。
Offenders against the first rule3), lobbying on issues concerning defense, diplomacy and mainland affairs and national security or state secrets, will be sentenced to up to three years in prison and a NT$ 5 million fine.
違反第一項規定,就國防、外交及大陸事務涉及國家安全或國家機密進行遊說者,處三年以下有期徒刑,得併科新臺幣五百萬元以下罰金。
Fines concerning the second rule are in correspondence with article 19 of the Lobbying Act.
第二項所定之罰鍰,由遊說法第二十九條規定之機關處罰之。

Article 6
第 6 條
Any person receiving instructions, being entrusted or receiving financial support from or by infiltration sources to contravene Criminal Code article 149 to 153, or the Assembly and Parade Act’s articles 31 shall have his sentence increased by one half.
任何人受滲透來源之指示、委託或資助,而犯刑法第一百四十九條至第一百五十三條或集會遊行法第三十一條之罪者,加重其刑至二分之一。

Article 7
第 7 條
Offenders who receive instructions, being entrusted or receiving financial support from or by infiltration forces and contravene Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Act Chapter 5 or Civil Servants Election And Recall Act Chapter 5, shall have their sentences increased by one half.
受滲透來源之指示、委託或資助,而犯總統副總統選舉罷免法第五章、公職人員選舉罷免法第五章或公民投票法第五章之罪者,加重其刑至二分之一。

Article 8
第 8 條
Legal persons, groups or other institutions in contravention of articles 3 to 7, will have the persons in charge be punished, and these legal persons, groups or institutions will be fined with amounts as stipulated by the respective articles.
法人、團體或其他機構違反第三條至第七條規定者,處罰其行為負責人;對該法人、團體或其他機構,並科以各條所定之罰金或處以罰鍰。

Article 9
第 9 條
Infiltration sources handling activities as of articles 3 to 7 or which instruct, entrust or financially support others to contravene articles 3 to 7 will be cut off based on the respective articles.
滲透來源從事第三條至第七條之行為,或指示、委託或資助他人從事違反第三條至第七條之行為,依各該條規定處斷之。
This also applies to any person receiving infiltration sources’ instructions, who are entrusted or financially aided by them, or who pass such instructions, missions or financial aids on to others.
任何人受滲透來源指示、委託或資助而再轉指示、委託或資助者,亦同。

Article 10
第 10 條
Offenders who turn themselves in or who confess during investigations or court hearings, shall have their punishment reduced. Those who turn themselves in and prevent major damage to national security or interests shall be exempted from punishment.
犯本法之罪自首或於偵查或審判中自白者,得減輕或免除其刑;自首並因而防止國家安全或利益受到重大危害情事者,免除其刑。

Article 11
第 11 條
All levels of government organs with cases contravening articles 3 to 9 should actively transfer their cases to, or inform, the prosecutors office, or police and justice administration, for investigation.
各級政府機關知有違反第三條至第九條之情事者,應主動移送或函送檢察機關或司法警察機關偵辦。

Article 12
第 12 條
This law comes into effect on the day of its promulgation.
本法自公布日施行。

____________

Notes

1) Year 109, i. e. 1911 (the year of the Wuchang Uprising): 1911 + 109 = 2020.
2) I’m not sure if this is about referendums, or about other votes, too.
3) Apparently the two rules following each other within the Lobbying Act, Article 2.
____________

Related

Anti-infiltration Act, Wiki, last edit March 3

____________

Tuesday, March 3, 2020

News from “People’s Daily’s” Be-afraid-lazy-Cadre Column

1. News item

CPC News Website, Beijing, March 2, 15:17. (Ren Jiajun reporting.) According to “Hubei Daily’s” WeChat public account, Hubei provincial prison administration office held a cadre meeting and announced the provincial party committee’s and the provincial party committee’s organization department’s decision:

中国共产党新闻网北京3月2日电 (任佳晖)据《湖北日报》微信公众号消息,今日下午,湖北省监狱管理局召开干部会议,宣布省委和省委组织部决定:

Comrade Jia Shisong is appointed the provincial court office’s party committee member, provincial prison administrative bureau party secretary, and its director.  Comrade Dong Yuhua is appointed provincial prison administration bureau deputy party secretary and political commissar;

贾石松同志任省司法厅党委委员、省监狱管理局党委书记、局长,董煜华同志任省监狱管理局党委副书记、政治委员;

Comrade Hao Aimin is removed from his posts as provincial court office party committee member, as provincial prison administrative bureau party secretary, and its director. Comrade Hu Chenghao is removed from his posts as provincial prison administration bureau party committee member, as provincial prison administration bureau’s deputy party secretary, and as the bureau’s director,

免去郝爱民同志的省司法厅党委委员、省监狱管理局党委书记、局长职务,免去胡承浩同志的省监狱管理局党委委员、副局长职务,

Comrade Zhang Xinhua is removed from his posts as provincial prison administration bureau party committee member, and as political department director.

免去张新华同志的省监狱管理局党委委员、政治部主任职务。

The column’s red keywords are about personnel (人事), anti-corruption (反腐), and examination (观察). The items can be found on “People’s Daily’s” main page, some scrolls down and to the right.

2. Background

Fourteen minutes before “CPC News Website” (i. e. “People’s Daily”) published the appointment and removal notices, “China News Service”, a “state-level” news agency, published an article with details about the removed cadres’ alleged shortcomings.

Here’s a translation by “Teller Report” (no warranty for correctness), and the original article.

____________

Related

“The Masses aren’t satisfied,” Mar 2, 2020
Citizen-Power Fantasies, Dec 6, 2014
____________

Sunday, March 1, 2020

Sino-German relations: two Countries, irreconcilable Interpretations, common Ground

The following are excerpts from an article published by Guanchazhe on Friday, written by Huang Ying (黄颖), a researcher with Tongji University’s German Studies Center.

By political turmoil or upheaval, her article refers to the botched attempt of the conservative-liberal parties in Thuringia’s parliament to get to power with support from far-right parliamentarians.

CDU chairperson Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer resigned a few days after she had failed to get her Thuringian partisans back to the federal party line which ruled out cooperation both with the Left Party and the far-right AFD. Huang’s article gives a detailed account of these political events, and then addresses the question about if and how they could affect China’s relations with Germany. The translated paragraphs all deal with this question.

Links within blockquotes added during translation.

Related: “Enhancing and deepening”, German foreign office article, Febr 13, 2020 (click picture for text)

Main Link: Will Germany’s political turmoil affect Sino-German relations? (德国政坛动荡,会不会给中德关系带来不确定性?) – page 2

[…]

A lot of people will ask if Germany’s political turmoil could bring uncertainty to Sino-German relations. The author believes that basically, Germany’s China policy won’t be greatly affected. Although Sino-German economic relations are close, China’s strategic significance for Germany – in political terms – comes only after the European Union and the United States. Germany’s domestic political turmoil won’t change its fundamental political system. No matter to which degree the structure of its political parties may be in upheaval, Germany won’t stop denouncing China’s political system and human rights issues. China’s economic and political rise makes it a challenger in the eyes of Germany’s political and academic circles, not only a challenger of its economy, but also a possible challenger for the Western democratic political system. The fundamental and insurmountable conflict between China and Germany concerning the political systems and values, and the two countries’ different interpretations of freedom, democracy, rule of law, human rights etc. remains irreconcilable, no matter which political party is in power.

不少人会问,德国政坛动荡会不会给中德关系带来不确定性。笔者看来,德国对华政策基本上不太会受到影响。虽然中德经济关系日益紧密,但是从政治角度来看,中国对德国的战略重要性次于欧盟和美国,德国内政的动荡不会改变其基本政治制度。无论德国政党格局怎么动荡,德国不会停止对中国制度和人权问题上的诟病。中国经济和政治崛起被德国政界和学界都视为挑战者,不仅挑战其经济制度,还可能挑战西方的民主政治制度。中德之间存在着根本的不可逾越的政治制度和价值观冲突,两国对自由、民主、法治、人权等方面有着不同的解读,无论德国哪个党派执政,这一冲突都不可调和。

However, recent Sino-German relations have become somewhat easier, which can be seen from two things above all. The first is where the German government stands on the issue of allowing Huawei participation in the building of Germany’s 5G network. At the end of January, the British government had made it clear that Huawei would be allowed to participate in the building of non-central components of Britain’s 5G network, but not in the construction of the sensitive sites, such as nuclear power stations or military bases. This matches two demands: it doesn’t endanger national security and won’t damage relations with important allies (America), and it allows Britain to use new technology and to maintain its competitiveness in the markets.

不过,最近的中德关系有所缓和,这主要表现在两件事上。第一件是备受关注的德国政府对是否允许华为参与德国5G网络建设的表态。一月底,英国明确表态:允许华为参与英国5G网络非核心部分的建设,但不能参与核电站和军事基地等重要网络和敏感地点的建设。这一表态实现了两全:一方面不危及国家安全和不破坏与重要盟友(美国)的关系,另一方面又可以使英国使用新技术和保持市场竞争力。

Soon after that, the European Union also suggested that there was no need to keep Huawei out, and member countries should be allowed to use Huawei equipment, provided that these installations were up to mobile net operation standards and that national security was protected, thus avoiding too much dependence on one supplier. After Britain and the EU had made their positions clear, it was no surprise that Germany’s governing coalition reached a consensus on February 12, saying that Huawei shouldn’t be automatically excluded from the 5G network construction, but that Huawei would have to comply with the highest safety standards. This decision still needs to be negotiated and passed with the social democratic coalition partner1). Before, many social democratic members had opposed Huawei’s participation in Germany’s 5G construction. It can basically be safely said that in 5G network construction, Germany won’t exclude Huawei, and this position will also have a positive influence on other EU member states, and will benefit the stable development of Sino-German relations.

随后,欧盟也建议不要一开始就将华为排除在外,允许成员国采用华为的设备,前提是要收紧对移动网络运营商的安全要求,严格实施保护国家安全的设施,避免对一个供应商产生过分依赖。在继英国和欧盟纷纷表态后,果不出意外,德国联盟党议会党团于2月12日便达成一致,表示不应自动将中国的华为排除再5G网络建设之外,但要求华为必须遵守最高的安全要求。这一决定目前还要与执政伙伴社民党协商通过,此前,有不少社民党成员都反对华为参与德国的5G建设。基本上可以确定,在5G网络建设上,德国不会将华为排斥在外,而且德国的表态还会积极影响欧盟其他国家对华为的态度,这将有利于中德两国关系稳定发展。

What also brought about a turn for the better was that when China raised the nationwide strengths to fight the new-type corona virus, Germany gave China essential support and help. In early February, Germany’s foreign minister Heiko Maas expressed admiration for the Chinese government’s public, transparent and cooperative attitude and vigorous and effective measures against the “epidemic”. The plane that took German compatriots back to Germany had also delivered 5.4 tons of aid supplies to China.

另外,给中德关系带来转机的是,在中国举全国之力抗击抗新冠肺炎的时刻,德国给予了中国必要的支持与帮助。2月初,德国外长海科·马斯(Heiko Maas)对中国政府在抗“疫”过程中采取的公开、透明、合作态度以及有力、有效的措施表示钦佩。借撤侨之机,将5.4吨援助物资运抵中国。

When meeting Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi in Berlin on February 13, Merkel said that Germany highly appreciated the firm and vigorous control measures taken by China to resist the epidemic, and would continue to provide China with support and help. […]

2月13日,默克尔在柏林会见王毅外长时表示,德方高度赞赏中国在对抗疫情时采取的果断有力的防控措施,会继续向中方提供支持和帮助。[…]

While Huang Ying argues that there is common ground, the commentariat (or, maybe, just the comments that remain undeleted) are mixed in their views. On the defensive side, demands for esthetic repairs are made:

The title doesn’t fit, it seems to suggest that China is meddling in Germany’s domestic politics. How about changing it into: How does Germany’s multi-party plight affect China,*)

标题不当,好像中国要干涉德国内政
改一下如何:德国的多党困境,对中国有啥影响

or

Just a trade partner. Germany only looks at China’s wallets. Don’t count on anything else.

一个商业伙伴而已。德国只看中了中国的钱包。其他难指望。

Replying to the reader who worries about the title, another commenter suggests that

I think you are too sensitive, elder brother. […] The ambassador to Germany has kept saying that “no Huawei, no Audi”. Isn’t that interference in German domestic politics?

我倒觉得大兄弟你太敏感了 […] 驻德大使直接放话了,不能搞华为,否则就搞奥迪了。这算不算干涉德国内政?

____________

Note

*) Don’t know if the title has hence been changed.

____________

Related

德国政治面临何种变局, 澎湃, Dec 7, 2018

____________

%d bloggers like this: