Archive for June 15th, 2012

Friday, June 15, 2012

China’s “Soft-Power Own Goals”: Stop Laughing, Start Thinking

Citing a number of issues in the news (see links there), Rectified Name states that China keeps scoring own goals in terms of soft power, when it comes to the question as to how to react to unwelcome events somewhere abroad.

This mixture of criticism on the one hand, and advice to China’s dictators as to how to improve their image on the other, are a pattern that emerges regularly, frequently among Westerners, but I’ve also seen a Korean example. This approach, however, leaves a few crucial factors out of the account.

For one, it is diplomats who will care most about soft power. Yang Jiechi, China’s foreign minister, isn’t even a politbureau member. Like state-sponsored scientists, diplomats may compile working papers, but they are probably not calling the shots.

Obviously, China’s rulers would rather like to see the Dalai Lama under quarantine in Dharamsala. But to suggest, in this context, that Beijing will only get the opposite of what it actually wants, ignores the fact that there is already a number of countries where the Dalai Lama is unlikely to get a visa for the rest of his lifetime. Much more vital questions – if basically market economies can afford trade with a state-capitalist economy without a plan of their own, for example – aren’t even seriously discussed in Europe.

Another – related – misconception is that to be viewed positively would be the CCP’s “A” priority. It isn’t. They want a nice image for themselves and for China, but not as an end in itself. They rather want a nice image and control, but control comes first. From Beijing’s perspective, to become successful in both these fields will mainly be a question of perseverance – and of their “opponents'” self-overestimation.

Under these circumstances, scoffing at Beijing’s regular “representations” amounts to burying one’s head in the sand.

Rather than doing that, we need to ask ourselves where we want to be in ten or twenty years. If we still want our politicians and event managers to be the masters of their own appointment diaries by then, we’d better stop laughing at Beijing’s “own goals”, and start thinking instead.

Friday, June 15, 2012

FMPRC Press Conference Topics: Military Exercises and Fishing Bans

Regular press conference at China’s foreign ministry, spokesman Liu Weimin (刘为民),  on June 14, 2012. The two following questions were apparently asked as the press conference was nearing its end.

Question: Reportedly, the U.S., Japan, and South Korea will conduct joint military exercises south of the Korean peninsula. How does China comment on this?

問:據報道,美日韓將在朝鮮半島南面舉行聯合海上軍事演習。中方對此有何評論?

Answer: China believes that the international community, and particularly the Asia-Pacific countries, should do more to protect peace and stability on the Korean peninsula and North-East Asia, rather than acting in an opposite direction.

答:中方認為,國際社會尤其是亞太國家應該多做維護朝鮮半島以及東北亞地區的和平穩定的事情,而不是相反。

Question: Chinese fishing boats are still in the Huangyan Island [Scarborough Shoal] waters for fishing-industry production. Is this in conflict with the Chinese fishing moratorium?

問:中國漁船仍在黃岩島海域進行漁業生産作業,這是否與中方頒布的休漁令衝突?

Answer: I suggest that you do a bit of study on the moratorium issued by the Chinese side. The moratorium puts some limits on the moratorium’s scope, and not all work is banned. The Chinese fishing boats which are currently working in the Huangyan Island  waters are not in violation of the fishing moratorium.

答:我建議你研究一下中方頒布的休漁令的具體內容。休漁令對于休漁范圍有所限定,並非禁止所有作業。目前在黃岩島海域作業的中國漁船並不違反休漁令。

____________

Related

» Equality of States, Inquirer, May 25, 2012
» Dropping Anchor, Business Insight, May 17, 2012
» A Ban on South China Sea, AP, Jan 24, 2012

____________

%d bloggers like this: