Consumer safety will remain a topic for a long time to come. If you buy an adjustable office chair from China, choose simple technology – something to wind up manually. Something that, in the worst case, will break your legs.
Southern Metropolis Daily discussed consumer protection in China in connection with Toyota’s RAV4 on May 1, with some background information as to why relevant legislation in China doesn’t seem to work for the consumers’ benefit.
In a completely unrelated case, two lawyers, Tang Jitian and Liu Wei, who represented a Falun Gong practitioner, have had their licenses permanently revoked this month, the New York Times reported on Monday. According to Liu Wei, they weren’t even informed about the questionable move in written form.
Their client, Yang Ming, wasn’t exactly a nobody. He reportedly staged the silent protest surrounding Zhongnanhai in 1999 after which the Chinese leadership went ballistic and launched a wave of arrests, plus an entertaining, but not really funny narrative industry about grannies trying to fly and almost killing themselves in the process, weeping party officials having gone Falun Gong and being visited by comrades who made them repent, and other sunday-school-like movie material. It added some ten to twenty minutes of airtime to CCTV’s main evening news for many nights after.
That was eleven years ago. But time – and the rule of law, the essential for a constitutional state – don’t seem to matter when it comes to “sensitive” issues. Whenever a case is Falun-Gong-related, China’s tender legal system is turned into a scrapheap – by exactly those who are supposed to defend it. On the other hand, convenience goods killing unsuspecting users are apparently no big deal (unless they are made in Japan).
The heart of the matter here isn’t if Falun Gong should be legal or banned. Rule of law is the issue.
Which leads me to the question if Mr Zhicheng Hu, an American citizen who has been released after having been held in China for almost a year on charges of misusing trade secrets, is to receive a decent compensation from the Chinese state, or if he shall count himself lucky for being allowed to leave the country at last.
He had been detained in Tianjin in a business dispute over automobile technology. His wife is quoted as saying that Hu was released this month with no charges filed against him.
Consumers won’t be safe in China any time soon. Not before the law itself will be safe.
____________
Related
Lawyers’ Licenses Revoked, RFA, May 8, 2010
Arrests: Can Chinese Media keep Track, Aug 2, 2009
Like this:
Like Loading...
[…] particular hint into that direction, as it is being played along with by many other countries too, although in…