<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mitt Romney has no China Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justrecently.wordpress.com/2012/10/23/mitt-romney-has-no-china-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justrecently.wordpress.com/2012/10/23/mitt-romney-has-no-china-strategy/</link>
	<description>China</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 05:44:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: For whichever Presidential candidate I&#8217;d vote, I wouldn&#8217;t vote for a Tea Partisan Congressional candidate &#124; Justrecently&#039;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://justrecently.wordpress.com/2012/10/23/mitt-romney-has-no-china-strategy/#comment-55305</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[For whichever Presidential candidate I&#8217;d vote, I wouldn&#8217;t vote for a Tea Partisan Congressional candidate &#124; Justrecently&#039;s Weblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 20:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justrecently.wordpress.com/?p=33242#comment-55305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Mitt Romney has no China Strategy Tuesday, October 23, 2012 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mitt Romney has no China Strategy Tuesday, October 23, 2012 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justrecently</title>
		<link>http://justrecently.wordpress.com/2012/10/23/mitt-romney-has-no-china-strategy/#comment-55269</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[justrecently]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justrecently.wordpress.com/?p=33242#comment-55269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;but he might want to revisit this idea that government involvement is inherently toxic to the rise of a given business or industry.&lt;/i&gt;

Gee - how un-American of you! Cracks aside, the defense of doctrines&#039; purity (stuff like &quot;free market&quot;) usually seems to come from vested interests, if not monopolies, and not from &quot;thinkers&quot;, even if businesses keep think tanks to have them do the philosophical decoration. The east-Asian and south-east Asian economic miracles would have been unthinkable without the state playing a guiding role. The problem for a government is to let go in time, in terms of (temporary) import tariffs, subsidies, tacit preferential treatment of domestic industries, etc.. Seems to me that the CCP finds the process of liberalization - in those terms, too - harder to do than most other former regimes in the region did.

That said, it isn&#039;t the CCP (or the CPSU, for that matter) who invented cartels or monopolies. Pure &quot;free-market&quot; ideology is probably &lt;i&gt;one&lt;/i&gt; of the roads that lead to the destruction of efficiently-performing markets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>but he might want to revisit this idea that government involvement is inherently toxic to the rise of a given business or industry.</i></p>
<p>Gee &#8211; how un-American of you! Cracks aside, the defense of doctrines&#8217; purity (stuff like &#8220;free market&#8221;) usually seems to come from vested interests, if not monopolies, and not from &#8220;thinkers&#8221;, even if businesses keep think tanks to have them do the philosophical decoration. The east-Asian and south-east Asian economic miracles would have been unthinkable without the state playing a guiding role. The problem for a government is to let go in time, in terms of (temporary) import tariffs, subsidies, tacit preferential treatment of domestic industries, etc.. Seems to me that the CCP finds the process of liberalization &#8211; in those terms, too &#8211; harder to do than most other former regimes in the region did.</p>
<p>That said, it isn&#8217;t the CCP (or the CPSU, for that matter) who invented cartels or monopolies. Pure &#8220;free-market&#8221; ideology is probably <i>one</i> of the roads that lead to the destruction of efficiently-performing markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Cathcart</title>
		<link>http://justrecently.wordpress.com/2012/10/23/mitt-romney-has-no-china-strategy/#comment-55268</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Cathcart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justrecently.wordpress.com/?p=33242#comment-55268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I doubt Mitt Romney knows much about the rise of the Japanese auto industry, but he might want to revisit this idea that government involvement is inherently toxic to the rise of a given business or industry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt Mitt Romney knows much about the rise of the Japanese auto industry, but he might want to revisit this idea that government involvement is inherently toxic to the rise of a given business or industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Cathcart</title>
		<link>http://justrecently.wordpress.com/2012/10/23/mitt-romney-has-no-china-strategy/#comment-55261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Cathcart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 21:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justrecently.wordpress.com/?p=33242#comment-55261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good point on Reagan and Taiwan. There were limits before, and limits there shall ever be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point on Reagan and Taiwan. There were limits before, and limits there shall ever be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justrecently</title>
		<link>http://justrecently.wordpress.com/2012/10/23/mitt-romney-has-no-china-strategy/#comment-55256</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[justrecently]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justrecently.wordpress.com/?p=33242#comment-55256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;“On Day 1 I will declare China a currency manipulator”. And then what?&lt;/i&gt;

Great question. I don&#039;t know. But Iran should be very afraid. Next time Syrians can&#039;t receive VoA clearly, Romney will &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.voanews.com/content/voa-bbc-broadcasts-jammed-from-syria/1529528.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;declare Tehran a &lt;satellite signal manipulator&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“On Day 1 I will declare China a currency manipulator”. And then what?</i></p>
<p>Great question. I don&#8217;t know. But Iran should be very afraid. Next time Syrians can&#8217;t receive VoA clearly, Romney will <a href="http://www.voanews.com/content/voa-bbc-broadcasts-jammed-from-syria/1529528.html" rel="nofollow">declare Tehran a &lt;satellite signal manipulator</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MKL</title>
		<link>http://justrecently.wordpress.com/2012/10/23/mitt-romney-has-no-china-strategy/#comment-55255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MKL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justrecently.wordpress.com/?p=33242#comment-55255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He&#039;s generally weak on foreign policy, but I think since he does&#039;t seem to have much of his own opinions, he&#039;s too much influenced by certain advisors. We saw how that went in the early 2000s. I particularly liked this part from Obama:

&quot;And when it comes to our military and Chinese security, part of the reason that we were able to pivot to the Asia-Pacific region after having ended the war in Iraq and transitioning out of Afghanistan, is precisely because this is going to be a massive growth area in the future. And we believe China can be a partner, &lt;b&gt;but we&#039;re also sending a very clear signal that America is a Pacific power, that we are going to have a presence there.&lt;/b&gt; We are working with countries in the region to make sure, for example, that ships can pass through, that commerce continues. And we&#039;re organizing trade relations with countries other than China so that China starts feeling more pressure about meeting basic international standards. That&#039;s the kind of leadership we&#039;ve shown in the region. That&#039;s the kind of leadership that we&#039;ll continue to show.&quot; (from the transcript)

I still think Obama&#039;s silent diplomacy with Chinese is much more effective than the erratic slogans such as &quot;On Day 1 I will declare China a currency manipulator&quot;. And then what?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s generally weak on foreign policy, but I think since he does&#8217;t seem to have much of his own opinions, he&#8217;s too much influenced by certain advisors. We saw how that went in the early 2000s. I particularly liked this part from Obama:</p>
<p>&#8220;And when it comes to our military and Chinese security, part of the reason that we were able to pivot to the Asia-Pacific region after having ended the war in Iraq and transitioning out of Afghanistan, is precisely because this is going to be a massive growth area in the future. And we believe China can be a partner, <b>but we&#8217;re also sending a very clear signal that America is a Pacific power, that we are going to have a presence there.</b> We are working with countries in the region to make sure, for example, that ships can pass through, that commerce continues. And we&#8217;re organizing trade relations with countries other than China so that China starts feeling more pressure about meeting basic international standards. That&#8217;s the kind of leadership we&#8217;ve shown in the region. That&#8217;s the kind of leadership that we&#8217;ll continue to show.&#8221; (from the transcript)</p>
<p>I still think Obama&#8217;s silent diplomacy with Chinese is much more effective than the erratic slogans such as &#8220;On Day 1 I will declare China a currency manipulator&#8221;. And then what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
