<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Political Confucianism&#8221; and the New York Times: Domestic Audience, Foreign Audience, who Cares (as long as Zhongnanhai listens)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justrecently.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/political-confucianism-and-the-new-york-times-domestic-audience-foreign-audience-who-cares-as-long-as-zhongnanhai-listens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justrecently.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/political-confucianism-and-the-new-york-times-domestic-audience-foreign-audience-who-cares-as-long-as-zhongnanhai-listens/</link>
	<description>China</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 05:44:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR&#8217;s China Soft Power Summary, July 2012 &#124; SinoMondiale</title>
		<link>http://justrecently.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/political-confucianism-and-the-new-york-times-domestic-audience-foreign-audience-who-cares-as-long-as-zhongnanhai-listens/#comment-54807</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JR&#8217;s China Soft Power Summary, July 2012 &#124; SinoMondiale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justrecently.wordpress.com/?p=31540#comment-54807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Chinese intellectual debates meant for domestic use are frequently more interesting than those about image-building abroad. That a bit of it emerged in an internationally-read paper, the New York Times, doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean that foreigners were the actual target readership. Jiang Qing, a hardcore Confucian (by his own standards, and depending on what you think Confucianism is about), and Daniel A. Bell published an op-ed on the NYT&#8217;s online edition on July 10: &#8220;A Confucian Constitution for China&#8221;. Bizarre (and possibly funny) stuff from a foreign perspective. Bizarre, too, but also worrying stuff from a secular Chinese perspective. Worrying, because in the last resort, the only readership that really matters is Zhongnanhai. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chinese intellectual debates meant for domestic use are frequently more interesting than those about image-building abroad. That a bit of it emerged in an internationally-read paper, the New York Times, doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean that foreigners were the actual target readership. Jiang Qing, a hardcore Confucian (by his own standards, and depending on what you think Confucianism is about), and Daniel A. Bell published an op-ed on the NYT&#8217;s online edition on July 10: &#8220;A Confucian Constitution for China&#8221;. Bizarre (and possibly funny) stuff from a foreign perspective. Bizarre, too, but also worrying stuff from a secular Chinese perspective. Worrying, because in the last resort, the only readership that really matters is Zhongnanhai. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
