<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunday Link Collection: Deutsche Welle under the Tyranny of Sina Weibo, and other Subtle Things</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justrecently.wordpress.com/2012/03/18/sunday-link-collection-deutsche-welle-under-the-tyranny-of-sina-weibo-and-other-subtle-things/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justrecently.wordpress.com/2012/03/18/sunday-link-collection-deutsche-welle-under-the-tyranny-of-sina-weibo-and-other-subtle-things/</link>
	<description>China</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:48:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Self-Censorship Training with Weibo &#124; Justrecently&#039;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://justrecently.wordpress.com/2012/03/18/sunday-link-collection-deutsche-welle-under-the-tyranny-of-sina-weibo-and-other-subtle-things/#comment-42186</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Self-Censorship Training with Weibo &#124; Justrecently&#039;s Weblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justrecently.wordpress.com/?p=29197#comment-42186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Comments Links to Tibet: Germ&#8230; on Foreign Ministry Spokesman: Ch&#8230;justrecently on Sunday Link Collection: Deutsc&#8230;Adam Cathcart on Sunday Link Collection: Deutsc&#8230;Sunday Link Collecti&#8230; on Why Are Mass [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments Links to Tibet: Germ&hellip; on Foreign Ministry Spokesman: Ch&hellip;justrecently on Sunday Link Collection: Deutsc&hellip;Adam Cathcart on Sunday Link Collection: Deutsc&hellip;Sunday Link Collecti&hellip; on Why Are Mass [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justrecently</title>
		<link>http://justrecently.wordpress.com/2012/03/18/sunday-link-collection-deutsche-welle-under-the-tyranny-of-sina-weibo-and-other-subtle-things/#comment-42007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[justrecently]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justrecently.wordpress.com/?p=29197#comment-42007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; links here, one in &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Die_Welt&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;English&lt;/a&gt;, and one in &lt;a href=&quot;http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Die_Welt&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;German&lt;/a&gt;, as you read in both languages anyway, Adam. The two articles seem to be slightly conflicting, and my understanding is that &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Die Welt&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; has been profitable during the past years (but I may be wrong). I seem to have read or heard that when &lt;b&gt;Axel Springer&lt;/b&gt; had bought Die Welt (he wanted a serious paper in his portfolio), another not-so-serious paper from his publishing house, the &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Bild-Zeitung&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (profitable indeed) cross-subsidized Die Welt for decades. However, the ideological angles of the two papers have always been similar after 1952 (the Bild-Zeitung, too, has gone with the times in certain ways, taking a more liberal view on many domestic, but not on international issues). 

&lt;b&gt;Siegfried Lenz&lt;/b&gt; worked at Die Welt during its pre-Springer days, i. e. the early years after the war. Only its &lt;i&gt;beginnings&lt;/i&gt; were promising, in my view, but either way, it co-wrote Germany&#039;s post-war history, through the decades.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two <b><i>Wikipedia</i></b> links here, one in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Die_Welt" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">English</a>, and one in <a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Die_Welt" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">German</a>, as you read in both languages anyway, Adam. The two articles seem to be slightly conflicting, and my understanding is that <b><i>Die Welt</i></b> has been profitable during the past years (but I may be wrong). I seem to have read or heard that when <b>Axel Springer</b> had bought Die Welt (he wanted a serious paper in his portfolio), another not-so-serious paper from his publishing house, the <b><i>Bild-Zeitung</i></b> (profitable indeed) cross-subsidized Die Welt for decades. However, the ideological angles of the two papers have always been similar after 1952 (the Bild-Zeitung, too, has gone with the times in certain ways, taking a more liberal view on many domestic, but not on international issues). </p>
<p><b>Siegfried Lenz</b> worked at Die Welt during its pre-Springer days, i. e. the early years after the war. Only its <i>beginnings</i> were promising, in my view, but either way, it co-wrote Germany&#8217;s post-war history, through the decades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Cathcart</title>
		<link>http://justrecently.wordpress.com/2012/03/18/sunday-link-collection-deutsche-welle-under-the-tyranny-of-sina-weibo-and-other-subtle-things/#comment-41958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Cathcart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 14:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justrecently.wordpress.com/?p=29197#comment-41958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Learning a great deal here about Die Welt, it&#039;s appreciated!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Learning a great deal here about Die Welt, it&#8217;s appreciated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
